Day 1569
Dnipro Basin Physiognomy
It has occurred to me that Z and Mykyta have started looking more alike over the past several weeks.
On IQ: No verified figures exist for either politician.
Similarities worth noting: Both are from the industrial Dnipro basin (Dnipro city vs. Kryvyi Rih — two hours apart). Both entered national politics through the same vehicle in 2019, with Poturaiev having been a pre-election advisor before becoming a Rada committee chairman. Poturaiev holds a political science degree from Dnipro National University’s Philology Faculty — a humanities background, like Z’s law degree from the same city’s university. Same diet?
Traffic for abdymok.substack.com (3/13/2026 - 06/11/2026)
The New York Times ran a piece yesterday about Ukraine’s “logistics lockdown”—the systematic drone campaign targeting Russian supply lines up to 100 miles from the front—and it is, in its way, an excellent piece of work. The photographs especially: Brendan Hoffman’s images of drones launched into bruised skies, soldiers scrawling messages of retribution on thermobaric wings, the dark silhouette of a Hornet against orange and blue at dusk. War as chiaroscuro. One looks at these photographs and feels, briefly, that the story is complete.
It is not complete. But let us not blame the photographs.
The article informs us that Ukraine now launches more than 5,000 mid- and deep-range strikes per month; that a single Ukrainian company has scaled its drone contract from 112 units in 2024 to 25,000 in the current cycle, that European nations have allocated $1.63 billion to Ukrainian drone production this year, more than in all of 2025. The Institute for the Study of War calls it a turning point. Jack Watling, writing in Foreign Affairs, adds the military argument: Russian combat performance is waning, Ukrainian tactical proficiency is quietly improving, and a ceasefire has moved from fantasy into the realm of possibility. A Ukrainian commander whose call sign is Whale explains the objective succinctly: Russia must learn that distance provides no safety.
All of this may be true. None of it is, strictly speaking, the whole story.
We explored the hidden assumption in Watling’s argument back on Day 1562. His diagnosis depends on the belief that people eventually submit to reality. The mistake lies in assuming this always happens.
This matters because the Times piece builds toward the suggestion that Ukraine’s logistics lockdown constitutes leverage toward an exit. Perhaps. But leverage requires a counterparty capable of receiving it.
There is also the question—which the Times piece, like most Western coverage, declines to ask—of what Ukraine exits the war with.
Last time I checked, Ukraine was functioning as a free R&D laboratory for Western defense industries, which have been capitalizing handsomely while Ukrainian producers wait. The $1.63 billion in European financing for drone production is presented as evidence of Ukrainian momentum. Financing, however, is not ownership. Nations allocating capital to Ukrainian drone production may also be acquiring production footholds, supply-chain relationships, and battlefield-tested intellectual property. They may be purchasing access rather than building sovereignty.
A craftsman who perfects a tool he does not own has performed a service. For whom, exactly, is a question the workshop does not answer.
The article mentions, in a subordinate clause that deserves a paragraph of its own, that Ukrainian companies have agreed to share technological and tactical advances “through a mechanism set up by the Ministry of Defense.” In a country whose state has not always distinguished reliably between defense procurement and asset distribution, one naturally wonders who controls the mechanism—and in which direction the learning flows.
Ukraine possesses genuine battlefield adaptability. The logistics lockdown is real. These facts coexist comfortably alongside another fact, one for which the Times piece has no framework: a leadership with structural incentives to manage the appearance of war’s end rather than its substance will always find a hopeful moment more useful than a reckoning over industrial sovereignty.
The drones are extraordinary. The photographs are beautiful.
The laboratory conditions remain excellent.