Day 685
A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit hears oral argument in United States v. Trump, a case concerning whether former President Donald Trump is immune from prosecution for his alleged role in the January 6 Capitol attack.
The proceedings will be streamed live starting 09:30.
Samuel Charap, the jackass who thought it would be a bad idea to provide Ukraine weapons to defend itself against fascistic Russia’s genocidal campaign, was a regular visitor to the White House last year. Why?
U.S. military intelligence these days may not be predictive, but the stupidity of Samuel has been constant. We have mentioned the Rand analyst several times since the start of The Great War in a non-complimentary fashion1.
Actually, no. The war started ten years ago, on February 20, 2014. Americans elected Trump two years later. Authorization of the sale of several hundred Javelin anti-tank missiles in 2018 was, er, not a great accomplishment.
On the Ukraine jacket, Z might attend Davos, January 15-19, with Argentina’s new president Javier Milei. The president’s visit to the venue might coincide with attempts in parliament to pass a law on forced military conscription in Ukraine.
I see an “en banc” request by #Trump’s attorneys to bank a little bit more time (and, premium billable hours) during the current appeal process in #DC over #Trump’s claim of ABSOLUTE immunity ... Here are the Three (3) women judges that currently hold the fate of the #Donald in their collective hands. One (1) is an #H.W. appointee. The other Two (2) are #JoeBiden appointees. So, what will it be? A perpetual orange jumpsuit for the toddler from #Queens? Or, a set of proverbial “cement goulashes” for his FAILED team of worthless attorneys? #The-Gloppitta-Gloppitta-Machine #En-banc